Transcendental of Principle Morals Kant

Kant’s the great philosopher in Aufklarung temporary who enlightening influence until now. He’s rather good man which has discipline and high-level thinking. Thinking such categorical imperative, grounding, critique, and etc, especially philosophy of criticize. If to discuss about Kant thought appears meaningfull, on the one hand, we can to add our knowledge, bring to falling empirical question, and the other hand, we can get method for useful to deconstruction our mather in live and metaphyfics.

On the same time, discursuss about morality to meet some case at Indonesia. Criminal act, suffering, porn act-porn grafics, hedonism in end yearth, free sex, and the other act morality done some people, the great disruptions, police and government cannot stopped them, because humant in the institute also broken act and heart. Similarly, public figure also to done some act which distortion matter in our society, actris even has been dehumanization some people use imitation for development habitual more broke. Some people very dezy from limited natural resources to spent energy.

From whole thinking, especially philosophys, humant can do everything, to defend our body from science, technology, modernity engeneering. The thinking quite important to make weath, freedom, and equel in the world.

In circumstance, some people more incunation use pragmatical reason than pure or transcendentalism reason for supposed answer if because whole thought Kant very useful, namely, for development our mine to get the truth. And then further, whole thought him, about metaphysics of morals conceived abstraction and deep-meaningfull theory. For attainmend, we must be seriaus and deep contemplation-reflection for that.

Kant our temporary, philosopher has cuminate, hard done to meet existence God, will of humant (basical insting). Accordingly, the moral law makes no distinctions between God and man. God will to good act in oneself to explain will God. God’s being, and always rememorize oneself conduct the better aims.

On the other field, will of humant (basical insting), its means that starting to search the truth by use a priori reason enough. For the will stand between it’s a priori, which is formal, and it’s a posteriori spring which is material. A priori, which certainly is only possible in rational being. However, categorical imperative also considered imposed a rational work. Its can to be discovered the truth and make foundation of morality. This is not same with empirical reason as practical reason, which only cant treats phenomenon. The pure reason from grounding and critique, according with natural science which got the precise truth. Both that fundamental value, grounding and critique to given really-truth.
Kant says that categorical imperative can be make rather toward ordinary morality of law, but transcendentalism to metaphysics of moral. Some people might empirical question, actually, include Antropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Whole that empirical question only be field slowly, Antropology contained habitual and culture which still biased evil. So, pure of reason as a whole the thinking method very good to make subtanse important in morality system


Awaludin Marwan, SH